Pick E2B if…
You're building a code-interpreter agent, or you need Firecracker microVM isolation and you're already comfortable stitching it with Browserbase for browser and rolling your own auth.
WHY JETTSON
Why not just use E2B, Cloudflare, or NemoClaw?
We get this question a lot. Here's the honest answer.
Feature comparison
| Feature | Jettson | E2B | Cloudflare Sandbox | NVIDIA NemoClaw |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best for | Indie devs shipping production agents | Code-interpreter sandboxes | Devs already on Cloudflare | Enterprise self-hosting |
| Persistent state | Beta | |||
| Browser included | Use Browserbase | |||
| Signed agent identity | Web Bot Auth | |||
| Memory between runs | Beta | |||
| Time to first agent | < 2 min | < 5 min | < 10 min | Hours (self-host) |
| Pricing | $19/mo flat | $150/mo + usage | $5 + usage | Free (self-host costs) |
| Best fit | One person, fast | Code execution focus | Already on CF | Enterprise SOC2 |
HONEST GUIDANCE
Which one should you pick?
Pick Cloudflare Sandbox if…
You're already a Cloudflare Workers user and you want the lowest-friction add-on inside an ecosystem you already pay for.
Pick NemoClaw if…
You're an enterprise running OpenClaw and you need to self-host on your own infrastructure for compliance reasons.
Pick Jettson if…
You're one person or a small team. You want to ship an agent to production this week without thinking about infrastructure, stitching services, or learning a new ecosystem. You'll pay $19/mo to skip the glue code.
Sound like you?
Skip the glue code. Spin up your first agent in two minutes.